Wednesday, 1 August 2012

Couple to remarry 48 years after divorce


They got hitched while still in their teens, divorced 20 years and four children later, and are getting remarried after nearly a half-century apart.

For Lena Henderson and Roland Davis, both 85 years old, the second time around is finally here. The couple plans to get married again on Saturday, with four generations on hand to see it happen. “It’s every child’s dream, every child who has ever been in a family where divorce has occurred, that your parents would come back together,” their youngest daughter, Renita Chadwick, said Tuesday as wedding preparations were in full swing.

“We are all so ridiculously excited. We’re like little children again,” said Chadwick, herself a grandmother.

Henderson and Davis met as teenagers in Chattanooga, Tenn., and were married by a justice of the peace. There was no reception or honeymoon.

“Oh no,” Henderson recalled with a laugh. “He went to work and I went home.” Davis was a hotel bellhop at the time, about to begin a career in the military.

This time around, a church wedding is planned, at Elim Christian Fellowship Church in Buffalo, followed by a reception at an Amherst restaurant.

Still no honeymoon trip, though. “I’m just happy that we’re here,” said Davis, who recently moved to suburban Buffalo from Colorado, where he was living alone following the death of his second wife in January. Henderson also was widowed after re-marrying.

Davis proposed to Henderson over the phone around Easter and she accepted, even though they hadn’t seen each other since a family funeral in 1996. Before that, the two hadn’t been face-to-face since splitting up in 1964, though they had stayed in touch and kept up with each other’s lives through the children. Their oldest daughter, Johnnie Mae Funderbirk, had been urging her father to return to New York since his wife’s death.

Davis was receptive, especially to the idea of reconnecting with Henderson.

“I had always kind of had that in mind, mostly because of the children,” he said. “You never forget someone that you cared for at one time or another.”

Henderson and Davis both said it was “nice” to see one another again, this time as an engaged couple.

The children are less reserved. “I’m as excited as some 9-year-old whose parents are getting back together,” Funderbirk said, “and I’m 65 years old.” ap

culled Daily Times

8 BADMINTON PLAYERS SENT HOME FOR DELIBERATELY LOSING MATCHES





All eight badminton players at the centre of a match-throwing scandal at the London 2012 Olympics have been disqualified.
The top seeds from China, two pairs from South Korea and another from Indonesia deliberately conceded points in an apparent attempt to lose their matches and manipulate the quarter-final draw in the women’s badminton doubles.
At a hearing held this morning, the decision was taken to disqualify the four pairs from the Olympics.
All eight had previously been charged by the Badminton World Federation with “not using one's best efforts to win a match” and “conducting oneself in a manner that is clearly abusive or detrimental to the sport”.
The Indonesians and Koreans have appealed against the decision and the outcome of that is expected to be communicated before the evening session, when the pairs were scheduled to play.
If disqualified it is thought the schedule will be reconstituted.
One suggestion for who will take their place is to allow the pairs who finished third and fourth in the groups behind the disqualified players to take their places in draw.
The match-throwing scandal began when top seeds Wang Xiaoli and Yu Yang appeared to engineer defeat against Korea's Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na to avoid finishing top of their group.
That would have kept them in the opposite side of the draw to compatriots Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei, meaning the Chinese would meet in the final, instead of the semi-final.
The Koreans responded by apparently trying to lose themselves, before a second pair from their country, Ha Jung-eun and Kim Min-jung, took the retaliation further by failing to play properly against Indonesia's Meiliana Jauhari and Greysia Polii.
In turn, the Indonesians then became involved themselves.
Former British badminton star Gail Emms had led calls for the four women's pairs to be kicked out of the Games.
She also claimed the referee had been warned before the matches that something 'dodgy' could happen, but the concerns were dismissed.
Emms, who won Olympic silver with Nathan Robertson in the mixed doubles in Athens in 2004, was outraged by the conduct and told BBC Radio Five Live: 'This is the Olympic Games, if badminton wants to save face I personally feel they should disqualify the four pairs and re-instate the pairs who came third and fourth in the group and then have a better competition.
'You cannot do this in an Olympic Games, this is something that is not acceptable and it just makes not only our sport but the organisers and the poor crowd who had to watch, who pay good money to watch two matches....it was just disgraceful, absolutely disgraceful.
'I would disqualify them.'
Lord Sebastian Coe described the conduct of the badminton players as 'depressive' and 'unacceptable' as spectators in the crowd were treated to a farce.
The decision by the BWF to introduce a group stage rather than hold a straight knockout competition had not been universally popular.
Fears that players could contrive results had even been expressed to tournament referee Thorsten Berg by some teams earlier in the day.
France coach Fabrice Vallet said: "By deciding to organise the tournament with a group section, when you had two doubles pairs of certain countries, it was obvious something like this would happen. It happened.
"During the team managers' meeting I think the Australian team manager asked the question about the situation.
"He was asking for all the matches to be played at the same time to avoid this type of thing."
Berg himself became involved in the commotion when he entered the court to disqualify the second Korean pair and the Indonesians but retracted his decision.
The BWF themselves have not had an auspicious Olympics having upset several players on the eve of competition by making wholesale revisions to the playing schedule.
It transpired the governing body had not followed their own regulations for arranging fixtures in group stages.




All eight badminton players at the centre of a match-throwing scandal at the London 2012 Olympics have been disqualified.
The top seeds from China, two pairs from South Korea and another from Indonesia deliberately conceded points in an apparent attempt to lose their matches and manipulate the quarter-final draw in the women’s badminton doubles.
At a hearing held this morning, the decision was taken to disqualify the four pairs from the Olympics.
All eight had previously been charged by the Badminton World Federation with “not using one's best efforts to win a match” and “conducting oneself in a manner that is clearly abusive or detrimental to the sport”.
The Indonesians and Koreans have appealed against the decision and the outcome of that is expected to be communicated before the evening session, when the pairs were scheduled to play.
If disqualified it is thought the schedule will be reconstituted.
One suggestion for who will take their place is to allow the pairs who finished third and fourth in the groups behind the disqualified players to take their places in draw.
The match-throwing scandal began when top seeds Wang Xiaoli and Yu Yang appeared to engineer defeat against Korea's Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na to avoid finishing top of their group.
That would have kept them in the opposite side of the draw to compatriots Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei, meaning the Chinese would meet in the final, instead of the semi-final.
The Koreans responded by apparently trying to lose themselves, before a second pair from their country, Ha Jung-eun and Kim Min-jung, took the retaliation further by failing to play properly against Indonesia's Meiliana Jauhari and Greysia Polii.
In turn, the Indonesians then became involved themselves.
Former British badminton star Gail Emms had led calls for the four women's pairs to be kicked out of the Games.
She also claimed the referee had been warned before the matches that something 'dodgy' could happen, but the concerns were dismissed.
Emms, who won Olympic silver with Nathan Robertson in the mixed doubles in Athens in 2004, was outraged by the conduct and told BBC Radio Five Live: 'This is the Olympic Games, if badminton wants to save face I personally feel they should disqualify the four pairs and re-instate the pairs who came third and fourth in the group and then have a better competition.
'You cannot do this in an Olympic Games, this is something that is not acceptable and it just makes not only our sport but the organisers and the poor crowd who had to watch, who pay good money to watch two matches....it was just disgraceful, absolutely disgraceful.
'I would disqualify them.'
Lord Sebastian Coe described the conduct of the badminton players as 'depressive' and 'unacceptable' as spectators in the crowd were treated to a farce.
The decision by the BWF to introduce a group stage rather than hold a straight knockout competition had not been universally popular.
Fears that players could contrive results had even been expressed to tournament referee Thorsten Berg by some teams earlier in the day.
France coach Fabrice Vallet said: "By deciding to organise the tournament with a group section, when you had two doubles pairs of certain countries, it was obvious something like this would happen. It happened.
"During the team managers' meeting I think the Australian team manager asked the question about the situation.
"He was asking for all the matches to be played at the same time to avoid this type of thing."
Berg himself became involved in the commotion when he entered the court to disqualify the second Korean pair and the Indonesians but retracted his decision.
The BWF themselves have not had an auspicious Olympics having upset several players on the eve of competition by making wholesale revisions to the playing schedule.
It transpired the governing body had not followed their own regulations for arranging fixtures in group stages.

Mother beat her partner to death after her children advised her on choice of weapons



SHARON HOLLINSWORTH researched buying date-rape drug rohypnol on the internet – and exchanged texts about the murder method with son Christopher, 19.
Sharon Hollinsworth admitted killing Adam Oates
Sharon Hollinsworth admitted killing Adam Oates
A MUM yesterday admitted murdering her partner after conspiring with her children.
Andrew Oates was beaten to death in a hail of at least 20 hammer blows in his
own home.
Sharon Hollinsworth, 44, yesterday pleaded guilty to the murder and conspiracy.
She had researched buying date-rape drug rohypnol on the internet – and exchanged texts about the murder method with son Christopher, 19.
In texts, Christopher discussed the use of a firearm and a hammer and who would carry out his father’s murder.
One text stated that the family didn’t have “the time or money for a gun”.
Daughter Natalie, 22, used the internet to look up murder methods – including the use of a hammer – and ways of disposing of bodies.
All three had been charged with murder but changed their pleas on day two of a trial at the High Court in Aberdeen.
Natalie and Christopher both admitted conspiring to murder.
Christopher Hollinsworth admitted conspiring to murder Andrew Oates
Christopher Hollinsworth admitted conspiring to murder Andrew Oates
Andrew, 44, died in October 2010 at his home in Peterhead. He had been with Sharon Hollinsworth since 1992 but they never married.
Yesterday, advocate depute Kath Harper, prosecuting, told the court: “Andrew Oates was a reclusive man who suffered from depression. He suffered from anxiety and anger management issues.
“At 3:30am on October 24, the three accused arrived at Grampian Police headquarters and Sharon Hollinsworth told officers there she had killed her partner.
“She said she had hit the deceased on the head with a hammer because he went for her son.
“Sharon Hollinsworth told the police that it was her intention to bury the body in the back garden.
“She confessed that she had started to dig but couldn’t go through with it.”
Police found Andrew’s body under a duvet with cable ties on his wrists. Splatters of blood were visible on the upstairs landing wall and floor. The bloodstained hammer was still in the family home.
Sharon Hollinsworth gave a description of her life with her “violent” partner when she confessed the murder to police.
The Crown agreed Andrew had assaulted her in 1998.
Lord Doherty remanded all three Hollinsworths in custody and deferred sentence until August 28. After the hearing, Andrew’s sister Sheena said it had been a difficult time for the family, particularly because they had to wait 14 months to bury him because Christopher was named as next of kin.
Sheena said: “It has been hard, especially for our parents, who are in their 80s.”
Detective Chief Inspector Martin Dunn, who led the inquiry, described it as a “calculated and premeditated” murder.
He said: “This was a violent and sustained attack which was compounded by the great lengths those involved went to in the aftermath of Andrew’s death to conceal the killing and to escape justice.”